When and How to Use Mixed-Method Research: Designs, Advantages, and Limits
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines mixed-method research as a response to complex phenomena that require complementary quantitative and qualitative data. It highlights its contribution to analytical richness, triangulation, and broadening of understanding, along with challenges: tensions between positivist and interpretive paradigms, complexity of articulation, and design, collection, and analysis requirements. It defines integration (fusion, sequential connection, or construction) in convergent, explanatory or exploratory sequential, and embedded designs; it describes key features (holistic information, contextual depth, interpretive-supported inference, instrumental efficiency); it delineates usage scenarios and requirements, and balances benefits with limits and risks. Methodologically, it is situated within the interpretive paradigm, with a qualitative approach and a hermeneutic method to critically analyze the literature. It includes a systematic review (2015–2024) in Scopus, Scielo, Redalyc, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria required an explicit focus on mixed methods, theoretical-methodological or epistemological discussion, and open access. Twenty-four documents were analyzed using open and integrated axial coding.